<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BCS blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/</link>
	<description>progressive politics from Madison, Wisconsin</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101405</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101405</guid>
		<description>Speaking for myself, I don't think a playoff would be bad. I just think it wouldn't be as much fun as the Rose Bowl. 

The thing with a playoff system is that, most likely, only the conference champion and probably the Big Ten #2 would participate -- 11 champions and 5 at large teams being the most likely option. So what a playoff would do for Big Ten football is to replace the Rose Bowl with a pretty good seed in a playoff, replace the Citrus Bowl with a bad seed in a playoff, and prevent the next 3-5 teams from playing a bowl game. At best, that's a wash for the champion, a step up for #2, and not so good for the rest.

And if anything, it will make cupcake scheduling (*) all the more important. It's not like March Madness, where there are enough at-large spots, and teams play enough games, that you can value tough losses more than pointless wins. You'd be required to either win your conference, or win all your non-conference games, to make the postseason.

I would certainly prefer to see a full round robin Big Ten schedule, with room left for a nice non-conference rivalry, and a cupcake.

(*)  I can't remember the last time Wisconsin played an interesting non-conference game (the game where the lights went out isn't what I mean...) -- they schedule more cupcakes than any team in the country -- but it's worked, to the extent that every Big Ten school that doesn't play in the Michigan-Ohio State game has announced at one time or another in the last decade that they are "looking for &lt;i&gt;our&lt;/i&gt; Barry Alvarez".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking for myself, I don&#8217;t think a playoff would be bad. I just think it wouldn&#8217;t be as much fun as the Rose Bowl. </p>
<p>The thing with a playoff system is that, most likely, only the conference champion and probably the Big Ten #2 would participate &#8212; 11 champions and 5 at large teams being the most likely option. So what a playoff would do for Big Ten football is to replace the Rose Bowl with a pretty good seed in a playoff, replace the Citrus Bowl with a bad seed in a playoff, and prevent the next 3-5 teams from playing a bowl game. At best, that&#8217;s a wash for the champion, a step up for #2, and not so good for the rest.</p>
<p>And if anything, it will make cupcake scheduling (*) all the more important. It&#8217;s not like March Madness, where there are enough at-large spots, and teams play enough games, that you can value tough losses more than pointless wins. You&#8217;d be required to either win your conference, or win all your non-conference games, to make the postseason.</p>
<p>I would certainly prefer to see a full round robin Big Ten schedule, with room left for a nice non-conference rivalry, and a cupcake.</p>
<p>(*)  I can&#8217;t remember the last time Wisconsin played an interesting non-conference game (the game where the lights went out isn&#8217;t what I mean&#8230;) &#8212; they schedule more cupcakes than any team in the country &#8212; but it&#8217;s worked, to the extent that every Big Ten school that doesn&#8217;t play in the Michigan-Ohio State game has announced at one time or another in the last decade that they are &#8220;looking for <i>our</i> Barry Alvarez&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish</title>
		<link>http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101404</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 00:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101404</guid>
		<description>Why would a playoff system be bad?  Not only would I not have to listen to ESPN complain about the BCS anymore, but I think it would probably cause teams to cut those silly early-season games where they play community colleges.  Since they would no longer need to pad their record to get into the post-season, they might opt to play better teams in the regular season in an effort to prepare for the playoffs.  Wouldn't it be cool if the Badgers just played every team in the Big10 (so ten tough games instead of 8 tough games and four cupcakes) and then went right into the playoffs?  At least, that's my high school always looked at the regular season events.  

I don't really care about "preserving the bowls."  The whole thing is shot, the Rose Bowl no longer means anything, so lets just re-create March madness for football fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would a playoff system be bad?  Not only would I not have to listen to ESPN complain about the BCS anymore, but I think it would probably cause teams to cut those silly early-season games where they play community colleges.  Since they would no longer need to pad their record to get into the post-season, they might opt to play better teams in the regular season in an effort to prepare for the playoffs.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be cool if the Badgers just played every team in the Big10 (so ten tough games instead of 8 tough games and four cupcakes) and then went right into the playoffs?  At least, that&#8217;s my high school always looked at the regular season events.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really care about &#8220;preserving the bowls.&#8221;  The whole thing is shot, the Rose Bowl no longer means anything, so lets just re-create March madness for football fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101402</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101402</guid>
		<description>Quite true.  BCS? Might as well throw darts, for all the accuracy it seems to have in picking the best teams.  Playoff?  Ugh.  Do we REALLY need that drawn out through the whole near-org@sm of the "holiday shopping season"?  I think not.  But give me a Rose Bowl shot each year, and that'll do well.  

Then again, what on earth did Nokia have to do with Sugar that one year anyway?  I mean, unless Cell Phones are the new Sugar, and Sugar is the new Oil... lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite true.  BCS? Might as well throw darts, for all the accuracy it seems to have in picking the best teams.  Playoff?  Ugh.  Do we REALLY need that drawn out through the whole near-org@sm of the &#8220;holiday shopping season&#8221;?  I think not.  But give me a Rose Bowl shot each year, and that&#8217;ll do well.  </p>
<p>Then again, what on earth did Nokia have to do with Sugar that one year anyway?  I mean, unless Cell Phones are the new Sugar, and Sugar is the new Oil&#8230; lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101399</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 07:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101399</guid>
		<description>Well, no. If there's going to be a playoff, I'd rather just get rid of the bowls altogether, and play a 16-team tournament in which the higher ranked teams play at home. That would be fun, but not as fun as the Rose Bowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, no. If there&#8217;s going to be a playoff, I&#8217;d rather just get rid of the bowls altogether, and play a 16-team tournament in which the higher ranked teams play at home. That would be fun, but not as fun as the Rose Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101398</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 05:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.badgerblues.org/2007/12/20/bcs-blogging/#comment-101398</guid>
		<description>Don't forget, even the Poinsettia Bowl has a slightly ridiculous name... it is officially the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl with a rich history dating all the way back to 2005.

Just because we've talked about playoffs and no playoffs A LOT, what if the playoffs incorporated the Rose Bowl?  Would that keep you happy?  First round game for the PAC-10 &#38; Big 10 is the Rose Bowl.  Winner keeps playing for the National Championship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget, even the Poinsettia Bowl has a slightly ridiculous name&#8230; it is officially the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl with a rich history dating all the way back to 2005.</p>
<p>Just because we&#8217;ve talked about playoffs and no playoffs A LOT, what if the playoffs incorporated the Rose Bowl?  Would that keep you happy?  First round game for the PAC-10 &amp; Big 10 is the Rose Bowl.  Winner keeps playing for the National Championship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
